Weekly Market Updates

One of the cool things about my job and Andrew’s is the people we interface with, via both emails and phones as well as face-to-face conversations. Said exchanges occur with financial  advisors and their clients, portfolio managers, the media, the international crowd, and the list goes on. Consequently, we thought we would share a few of the more interesting ones with our readers this morning. This one came for a portfolio manager last week in response to our recent quip about the yield curve:

The flattening of the yield curve (YC) is getting tons of attention, as you know and have pointed out in missives. But, what is too often not mentioned by media is there’s a big difference between a flattening YC and a flat or inverted YC. In fact, as you showed via Rich Bernstein research, some of the market’s best gains occur when the YC is close to, but not yet flat (between 0-50 bps spread). The point being anticipating the YC becoming flat or inverted is a waste of time and even counter-productive for investing. In this case, it’s an all-or-nothing event that until the YC actually does become completely flat or inverted, no problem, continue as you were. It’s not something where as the YC becomes flatter, you likewise should gradually become more bearish – wrong! It’s more like a light switch, when on we have light, when off, darkness. There’s no in between. And even when the YC does finally invert, you typically have 6-12 months of lead time for a recession, i.e. no need to panic.

Obviously Andrew and I agree. This one is from one of our financial advisors (FAs):

If this ends up being the “pause that refreshes” and we get a pullback in early/mid-February, would this be the end of the second leg, or only a pause? I know Leon Tuey and you maintain the second leg is the strongest and longest. If not, what typically ends a second leg? Some time ago you wrote about the three legs of a secular bull market.  I thought  you said the first leg started in 2008. Then again, I thought you had said that the secular bull market didn’t start until later (April 2013?). Can you help me out here?

Our answer read:

We think the first leg began on October 10, 2008 and ended in May 2015. The second leg began In February 2016 and  is ongoing. Nobody knows when the second leg will end, but when it does, we will go through another upside consolidation (like the one from 5-2015 to 2-2016) and then breakout to the upside beginning the start of the third, or speculative, leg. In the 1982 to 2000 secular bull market, the third leg began in late-1994 or early-1995 and lasted into the spring of 2000.

Then there was this from an FA’s client:

I have been putting my 401k contributions to cash for now to avoid buying high but I have not trimmed any of my holdings to generate cash since September.

Jeff, I get nervous when I hear terms like Wednesday Wilt and February Flop suggesting a pull back. However, I also think about the extra money in paychecks that may spur earnings even more going forward. What do you think about the tax reform stimulus making any February Flop a flop and bounce?

Our answer was, “Some of the phrases we use in our missives are alliterations (February Flop, Wednesday Wilt, Dow Wow, etc.) Yet, we have been very clear that if our short/intermediate-models get it right about a pullback in February, it should only be a 5-10% drawdown in an ongoing secular bull market that has years left to run.”

And then there was this statistic from our friends at Bespoke Investment Group:

Remarkable: Since 1993, if you bought SPY on open and sold on the close each day, the return would be -5.2%. But, if you did the opposite and bought on the close and sold on the open next day, the return would be 568% (meaning more than ALL the performance came in after-hours trading).

Our comment: “Amazing!”

Speaking to embracing commodity-centric stocks (stuff stocks) over the past number of months, because they are the cheapest relative to equities as they have been in decades, another portfolio manager notes: “Needless to say, if you like commodities, you have to also like non-US equities, especially emerging (EM) markets because the relative performance of EM and commodities are highly correlated.”

We respond, “Yes we do like EM if your time horizon is long enough, and you can see the correlation in Chart 1 on page 3.” We got this from one of the smartest guys in the room, namely Jason Goepfert of SentimenTrader fame:

The S&P 500 surged more than 1% and closed at a multi-year high on Friday, yet fewer than 55% of the issues on the NYSE advanced on the day. Even with all of the oddities from 2017, we never saw one this extreme. The only times since 1965 this has happened were 1987-03-23, 1999-03-18, 1999-11-18, and 1999-12-21. Each of them led to declines over the next two weeks, but it’s hard to put any weight on this when similar oddities failed so often in 2017.

Finally, there was this from our pal Doug Kass, captain of the sagacious Seabreeze Partners:

The supply of equities has been reduced because of a lower number of shares available due to a diminished supply of publicly traded stocks (halved in the last decade), the impact of buybacks (on the remaining companies), etc. The demand for equities is rising as expanding confidence has translated into record inflows into domestic equity funds in January. Aggregate trading volume has been recently trending markedly lower – exacerbating the aforementioned favorable supply and demand equation. During the last week investors added the most money on record into US  equity funds – pouring over $33 billion into stocks for the week ending January 24, 2018. The virtuous cycle of demand and supply has continued; and, is actually strengthening.

The call for this week: So, at the end of last year, we were asked by numerous participants what we envisioned for 2018. What we answered was, “We think it will be a repeat of 2017.” “Impossible’” was their reply! Subsequently we received this email from Marshall Schield, Chief Strategist for STIR Research LLC, who writes:

There is a 70% probability that this bull market has at least one more year of gains. Looking at just secular bull markets (1949–1968, 1982–2000, 2011–2017), history shows that the market will have multiple back-to-back up years before being interrupted by a negative year. Rarely does the market advance just one or two years before hitting a down  year. That sequence has only occurred three times, or 30% of the time. The market now has just finished its second up year with cumulative gains of more than 30%. History tells us that the market has a 70% probability of going three or more years with higher returns. The average gain if the market makes it to three consecutive up years is 58.7%. That would fit STIR’s 2018 outlook for another 20% gain this year, which would translate into a cumulative three-year gain of 57%.

Of course, we think this secular bull market has many more years left in it. This morning, as we write at 5:37 a.m. from Albany, NY, where we are speaking at a national engineering conference, the preopening S&P futures are off eight points as DJT considers retaliation against the EU for unfair trade policies, there is talk of nationalizing the G5 network, California considers a

$1,000 fine for waiters offering unsolicited plastic straws, and participants await tomorrow’s SOU address. Oh well, it must be a Monday, so beware the month of February.

Important Investor Disclosures

Raymond James & Associates (RJA) is a FINRA member firm and is responsible for the preparation and distribution of research created in the United States. Raymond James & Associates is located at The Raymond James Financial Center, 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716, (727) 567-1000. Non-U.S. affiliates, which are not FINRA member firms, include the following entities that are responsible for the creation and distribution of research in their respective areas: in Canada, Raymond James Ltd. (RJL), Suite 2100, 925 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2, (604) 659-8200; in Europe, Raymond James Euro Equities SAS (also trading as Raymond James International), 40, rue La Boetie, 75008, Paris, France, +33 1 45 64 0500, and Raymond James Financial International Ltd., Broadwalk House, 5 Appold Street, London, England EC2A 2AG, +44 203 798 5600.

This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity that is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country, or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation. The securities discussed in this document may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

For clients in the United States: Any foreign securities discussed in this report are generally not eligible for sale in the U.S. unless they are listed on a U.S. exchange. This report is being provided to you for informational purposes only and does not represent a solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security in any state where such a solicitation would be illegal. Investing in securities of issuers organized outside of the U.S., including ADRs, may entail certain risks. The securities of non-U.S. issuers may not be registered with, nor be subject to the reporting requirements of, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. There may be limited information available on such securities. Investors who have received this report may be prohibited in certain states or other jurisdictions from purchasing the securities mentioned in this report.

Please ask your Financial Advisor for additional details and to determine if a particular security is eligible for purchase in your state.

The information provided is as of the date above and subject to change, and it should not be deemed a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Certain information has been obtained from third-party sources we consider reliable, but we do not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete. Persons within the Raymond James family of companies may have information that is not available to the contributors of the information contained in this publication. Raymond James, including affiliates and employees, may execute transactions in the securities listed in this publication that may not be consistent with the ratings appearing in this publication.

Raymond James (“RJ”) research reports are disseminated and available to RJ’s retail and institutional clients simultaneously via electronic publication to RJ’s internal proprietary websites (RJ Investor Access & RJ Capital Markets). Not all research reports are directly distributed to clients or third-party aggregators. Certain research reports may only be disseminated on RJ’s internal proprietary websites; however such research reports will not contain estimates or changes to earnings forecasts, target price, valuation, or investment or suitability rating. Individual Research Analysts may also opt to circulate published research to one or more clients electronically. This electronic communication distribution is discretionary and is done only after the research has been publically disseminated via RJ’s internal proprietary websites. The level and types of communications provided by Research Analysts to clients may vary depending on various factors including, but not limited to, the client’s individual preference as to the frequency and manner of receiving communications from Research Analysts. For research reports, models, or other data available on a particular security, please contact your RJ Sales Representative or visit RJ Investor Access or RJ Capital Markets.

Links to third-party websites are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize, or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any third-party website or the collection or use of information regarding any website’s users and/or members.

Additional information is available on request.

See full article.